Culture

USES & ABUSESOF A TIGHT CULTURE

Organizational culture can be a huge asset or a crippling liability. In Built to Last, Collins and Porras make a powerful argument for creating “cult-like cultures.” (See also Culture and Bottom Line.)

But how tight should your organizational culture be? 

How “cult-like” can it get before it becomes dysfunctional? What are the signs or indicators of going too far? How can we reap the benefits of a strong, unique culture while minimizing the risks and costs of overdoing it, i.e., of creating a dysfunctional cult?

It is clearly valuable to have a culture that is unique, unified, integrated, whole, aligned, and authentic. Nevertheless, those very strengths can push a culture toward becoming too singular, simple, flat, narrow, close-minded, black & white, controlling/repressive, and inward looking.

Let’s contrast some of the potential benefits of a cult-like culture to the costs of creating a dysfunctional cult.

Benefits of a tight culture:

Organizations with tight cultures can enjoy these advantages:

  • More focused: a laser like focus can produce great results
  • Better alignment around aspirations, goals, actions, attitudes, values…
  • Ability to execute quickly and effectively (working as a tight unit)
  • Common language and better communication and teamwork
  • Trust and loyalty: better camaraderie, relationships, and employee retention
  • More efficient and effective new employee orientation and on-boarding
  • Highly inclusive of insiders: insiders are trusted
  • Exclusive (in a good way): “this place is special—it’s not for everyone/anyone”

Costs of going too far:

Organizational cultures that are too tight (too cultish) can suffer from these risks, costs, and negative consequences:

  • Close-minded, navel-gazing, self-absorbed, group think
  • Tyranny of the majority or of the true insiders (the cult leaders)
  • Resistant to new talent, new ideas, alternative perspectives
  • Difficulty absorbing newcomers
  • Little tolerance for the unconventional, avant-garde, outliers, mavericks, outsiders
  • Strict adherence to the status quo: don’t tolerate questioning the status quo (except within a narrow band of officially accepted dialogue)
  • Closed to feedback: negative feedback is seen as uninformed (“they don’t get it”)
  • Blind to the outside world: missing changes, trends, and opportunities
  • Rigid, inflexible, not adaptive—set in its ways and dogmatic about them
  • Exclusive (in a bad way): closed, snobby, arrogant, self-righteous, dogmatic…

Conclusion:

The benefits of a tight culture are clearly very high, as are the costs of overdoing it.

My next blog will continue this discussion:

  1. Culture or cult?
  2. Signs and costs of an arrogant and dogmatic culture

 

Copyright © 2013 Advanture Consulting, all rights reserved.

Advanture helps organizations take their leadership development practices up to the next level for enhanced business performance. Performance by design!

 

Advanture Consulting
Making strategy stick!
Tel: (866) 860-4880
Email: contact@AdvantureConsulting.com   
Web: www.AdvantureConsulting.com
Blog: http://AdvantureConsulting.com/blog/

Contact

Toll Free1-866-860-4880

Emailcontact@advantureconsulting.com

AddressSuite 3, 6005 - 11 Street SE
Calgary, AB
T2H 2Z3

Social